As mentioned, the Quest 3S is cheaper with a starting price of $299.99. It comes with the following specs:

If you upgrade to 256GB of storage, you'll have to shell out $399.99. In my experience with the Meta Quest 2 and Quest 3, 128GB was sufficient, netting me about 60 games and apps with some storage left over.

The Meta Quest 3, on the other hand, has a price of $499.99. It comes with the following:

It has the same chipset and RAM as the Quest 3S, but you'll get better displays, greater storage, and more refresh rate options. (More on that later.)

The Meta Quest 3S appears to be bulkier than the Meta Quest 3 — similar to the Quest 2. The pricier Quest 3, on the other hand, has a sleeker, more comfortable appearance.

The front part of the Quest 3S is different from the Quest 3, too. While both have a mostly-white body, the Quest 3S has its sensors arranged in a triangular pattern. However, the Quest 3, on the other hand, has its sensors arranged into larger, oval-shaped openings.

Both headsets have the same controllers.

It's also worth noting that the Meta Quest 3 has a 3.5mm headset jack, but the Quest 3S does not. This, however, doesn't mean that you can't connect headphones to the latter. You can still use USB-C headphones or Bluetooth-supported wireless earbuds.

The Meta Quest 3's displays have a higher screen resolution compared to the Quest 3S.

In my experience comparing the Quest 3S and Quest 3 side-by-side, the Quest 3's visuals are definitely sharper and more vivid.

Plus, the Quest 3 has a greater range of refresh rate options:

You may be wondering, "Why would anyone run their Quest 3 at 72Hz as opposed to 120Hz?" Well, for those who use PCVR, reducing the refresh rate may allow them to prioritize a higher resolution without taking too much of a performance hit.

It's also worth noting that the Quest 3S has fresnel lenses as opposed to the Quest 3's pancake lenses. Both lenses have their pros and cons, but pancake lenses are generally better, allowing for a lighter and thinner design, less distortion, and better image quality.

As someone who owns a Meta Quest 3, I'd say that its resolution quite middling. They're simply OK. As such, with the Quest 3 already having mid-tier visuals, you might be disillusioned by the Quest 3S' displays.

Both have the same feature set, including augmented reality (AR) with passthrough mode. Passthrough, which lets you see the world around you, relies on a 4MP camera and lets you enjoy AR experiences. For example, with Passthrough mode on, you'll have the opportunity to see the room you're standing in — even with your headset on.

For the uninitiated, AR is a blend of digital artifacts with your real-world environment. For example, in an AR game, you can dodge virtual aliens while diving behind the sofa in your living room.

Announced at Meta Connect 2024, you'll also have an easier time with spatial computing with Quest 3S and Quest 3.

Spatial computing was always available on the Quest series (at least as far back as the second-generation Quest 2 because I've demoed the ability to use it with a laptop in 2021.) However, it appears that, with a new update, the experience should be a lot more seamless with the two Quest 3 models, particularly if you have a Windows 11 PC. You'll have the opportunity to work with numerous virtual displays for a more immersive workflow.

"Quest is going to be a natural extension of your PC," Meta's CEO Mark Zuckerberg said.

To sum it up, on both the Quest 3S and Quest 3, you'll have access to AR and VR apps and games via the Quest Store, as well as support for PCVR with the Quest Link app. You can also play Xbox Game Pass games on both headsets.

The Quest 3 has a bigger battery: 5,060 mAh to be exact. The Quest 3S, on the other hand, sports a 4,324 battery.

According to our review, the Meta Quest 3 lasted one hour and 19 minutes with nonstop gameplay.

We also reviewed the Quest 3S, and as it turns out, according to our in-house testing, it lasted 2 hours and 30 minutes on a single charge.

The Quest 3S is cheaper and delivers longer battery life, but has a clunkier, more unwieldy design.

The Quest 3 is pricier and less power efficient, but has better weight distribution for increased comfort. Plus, it offers better visuals, too.

The winner depends on what you value more: battery life and cost effectiveness or better picture and comfort?